The final installment of Ken Miller's reply to Luskin is up. Here is a small taste:
The only relevant question at this point is the Discovery Institute keeps highlighting its own failings in this way. Why are Casey and his employers now -- three years after the Dover trial -- trying to rehabilitate the tattered credibility of both Michael Behe and Pandas? What mischief are they planning now?Read the comments on this post...
Read More...
[Source: ScienceBlogs : Combined Feed - Posted by FreeAutoBlogger]
